I've always been facinated how certain brands replace product names, such as Coke=soda, Kleenex=tissue paper, sharpie=permanent marker, ipod=mp3 player, etc. I've noticed in todays tech world that powerful brands also replace our everyday verbs. When a brand replaces a noun or verb in our mindsets, then it becomes a brand Sneezer (a brand that spreads fast and becomes ridiculously powerful!) Here's my short list of brands that have replaced a few of my everyday verbs!
I'll ____ it! Google= search/find Tivo= record Xerox= copy Ebay= sell(maybe buy or advertise) Fedex= mail (with quality) Kazaa= download ?= shop (maybe amazon someday) ?= email (maybe gmail soon)
it's not a monopoly, its brand recognition. Microsoft, Nike, Ikea, AT&T, Wal-Mart, etc are all huge compnaies, if not monopolies, but I have rarely, if ever, heard them used in such a way to replace a noun, or verb. Microsoft is a monopoly in software. Have you ever heard anyone say, I'm going to get some Microsoft?
brands that directly say what they do don't seem to work. tickets.com, email.com, buy.com, sell.com, mail.com, search.com, etc
A brand replacement name needs to create a new name, not define what is already known, otherwise, it's boring. Would you trust a compnay called, "notebooks" to buy your next laptop. Would you buy a car branded "Car". buy water from compnay "water"....a brand enhances a word. dasani is enhanced water. lexus, is a luxuary car, but not just a car. etc
But my point is that no one was able to brand its name on the blog platform and milked the market(became a sneezer)when it first came out.Flikr has done a great job on sharing photo,but other branded blog services such as Typepad and Wordpress are far less than impressive.
Curious and refreshing finds in art, design, technology, food, culture, experiences, lifestyles, entertainment, and all the other mind-provoking ideas that come with it!
Designverb covers elements in design that excite, inspire, captivate, and rattle our goofy creative minds!
5 Comments:
This is what we call monopoly in certain industry I guess.
Although it makes life simple,but sometimes is not a good thing to consumers.
Microsoft was a good example.
By
Anonymous, at 3/16/2006 10:05:00 PM
it's not a monopoly, its brand recognition. Microsoft, Nike, Ikea, AT&T, Wal-Mart, etc are all huge compnaies, if not monopolies, but I have rarely, if ever, heard them used in such a way to replace a noun, or verb. Microsoft is a monopoly in software. Have you ever heard anyone say, I'm going to get some Microsoft?
By
tango!, at 3/17/2006 08:54:00 AM
Sorry,I mean Windows when I say Microsoft.
I like your point on "sneezer"! But it surprises me that BLOG,such a cool platform,was not branded.
By
Anonymous, at 3/17/2006 11:00:00 AM
brands that directly say what they do don't seem to work. tickets.com, email.com, buy.com, sell.com, mail.com, search.com, etc
A brand replacement name needs to create a new name, not define what is already known, otherwise, it's boring. Would you trust a compnay called, "notebooks" to buy your next laptop. Would you buy a car branded "Car". buy water from compnay "water"....a brand enhances a word. dasani is enhanced water. lexus, is a luxuary car, but not just a car. etc
By
tango!, at 3/17/2006 11:53:00 AM
Good point.
But my point is that no one was able to brand its name on the blog platform and milked the market(became a sneezer)when it first came out.Flikr has done a great job on sharing photo,but other branded blog services such as Typepad and Wordpress are far less than impressive.
By
Anonymous, at 3/17/2006 04:48:00 PM
Post a Comment
<< Home